penfairy:

I was talking to someone about Fury Road today and they said ‘I just hated how it had no plot. They just left and then turned around and went straight back, it was so stupid’ and I think my soul was in danger of leaving my body because really - that’s the whole point. That’s the great message of Mad Max Fury Road - they need to leave and go back because they need to understand that the Green Place doesn’t exist. Valhalla doesn’t exist. There’s no better place waiting, no Eden to escape to, nowhere for Furiosa and the wives to run to. This world, broken and damaged and war-torn as it is, is all they have, and if they want a Green Place then they have to make it themselves. They have to choose peace. They have to choose love for each other. They have to take the seeds from the older, violent generation and start again. They have to destroy the oppressive power structures holding them back, capitalism and the patriarchy that Immortan Joe represents.

The Green Place was around them all along, and it takes this long, cyclical journey to understand that, both for them and for the audience. The circular narrative structure is an absolute work of genius, and the fact that the entire plot can be boiled down to “they leave and come back” is an indication of how well this works as an action movie - that the plot is simple enough so everyone can understand what’s going on while explosions are going off and cars are racing past at 100mph - yet it’s still incredibly rich and wonderfully complex too.

And what a pertinent message to send out - the generations before us killed the world and now it’s up to us to fix what’s broken. There’s no Green Place but the one we make ourselves, which will be born out of fire and blood and rise from the ashes of the old world.

(via cephalopodvictorious)

thegayteen:

Medicine should never have been privatized in the first place. The concept of profiting off of human desperation and the need for life-saving medicine is, philosophically, intrinsically, and morally wrong both as a fundamental concept and in practice. The fact that Martin Shkreli was ever able to buy an AIDS drug and increase its price 5000% is indicative of a problem even bigger than a truly evil, despicable, and selfish human being; it is indicative of the problem of the current system of for-profit pharmaceuticals with obviously inadequate price regulation.

(via starforged)

bootyscientist2:

bootyscientist2:

“Upload your resumé in PDF format”

“Now type out your work experience, even though you just fucking uploaded your resumé”

“While you’re at it, type out your education too, even though it’s on the fucking resumé as well”

image

“Great, now fill out this questionnaire too. It’ll only take 20-30 minutes! If we decide not to hire you, we won’t even give you the courtesy of an automated email telling you you’re not the right fit!”

image

(via cephalopodvictorious)

chescaleigh:

tentadog:

midcenturymama:

thefatebetweenus:

queerlybelovedones:

tito-burritto:

lesserkiwi:

anarchapella:

Unpopular opinion: straight people using “partner” to refer to their SO actually helps normalize the term so that lgbt folx can use it without automatically outing themselves to strangers. It also helps other straight ppl get comfortable with the fact that strangers aren’t entitled to information about other people’s gender or sexuality.

Give op their hard-earned notes

Tbh I hear “partner” and assume gay, I didn’t know straights used it. Very fair point, OP

I hear ‘partner’ and think ‘gay’ too. A girl at work used it for months and I just went with it. When she would say ‘he’ I even thought maybe he was trans*. Anyways, someone using partner makes me more comfortable and I came out to her. She was just an intelligent straight girl that liked the term and was knowledgeable in human sexuality so definitely someone I should have felt comfortable coming out too. It’s a good sign of a straight person uses it IMO.

As a mental health clinician, this is actually my blanket term when discussing any romantic relationship. I agree it normalizes it, but I also think it’s a relatively safe term to use to describe most romantic relationships without making any assumptions about the person’s orientation or identity. I also use the word “partnered” when describing a monogamous relationship status.

The term “partner” also removes the implied hierarchy of boyfriend/girlfriend vs husband/wife. This is relevant both to non-monogamous people, and unmarried individuals for whom the importance of their relationship isn’t dictated by its legal status. 

also you can make cowboy jokes

as a straight, it also helps me weed out homophobes. if they act suspect when i say “partner” i know they gots to go

(via starforged)

ifishouldvanish:
“ jaspurr:
“ daredevilbf:
“ roskii:
“ s0mbr4-h4xx3d-m3:
“ nyanbianry:
“ ina-gartens-weave:
“ wanderthewoods:
““Ice Cave” by Georgia O’Keeffe and a photograph of an ice cave.
”
yeah Georgia? that’s an ice cave ? that’s a god damn ice... ifishouldvanish:
“ jaspurr:
“ daredevilbf:
“ roskii:
“ s0mbr4-h4xx3d-m3:
“ nyanbianry:
“ ina-gartens-weave:
“ wanderthewoods:
““Ice Cave” by Georgia O’Keeffe and a photograph of an ice cave.
”
yeah Georgia? that’s an ice cave ? that’s a god damn ice...

ifishouldvanish:

jaspurr:

daredevilbf:

roskii:

s0mbr4-h4xx3d-m3:

nyanbianry:

ina-gartens-weave:

wanderthewoods:

“Ice Cave” by Georgia O’Keeffe and a photograph of an ice cave.

yeah Georgia? that’s an ice cave ? that’s a god damn ice cave? that’s the only thing you intended to paint? that’s it? just an ice cave?

all of georgia okeefes art is like this dont act surprised

image
image
image
image
image
image

It Really Is.

Staff seeing this:

image

i hate to ruin everyone’s fun BUT you guys are so annoying. georgia o’keeffe very specifically stated how much she hated it when people, especially men, sexualized her art. male art critics pushed the interpretation of her artwork as sexual onto her and it upset her VERY deeply:

“When people read erotic symbols into my paintings they’re really talking about their own affairs,” O’Keeffe said. Still, the sexualized misconceptions of her work devastated her. “I almost wept,” she wrote of one review in 1921.

http://nymag.com/arts/art/reviews/59249/

now, because of some immature dudes in the art community, her work has been sexualized forever, and her paintings are now sexual objects. so like…making pussy jokes about her artwork isn’t just annoying, it’s disrespectful to everything she worked for, and it’s like rubbing her legacy in her face.

also “all of her paintings are like that” is just plain wrong. she did a series of extreme close ups of flowers (which is where these paintings come from) but that was just one series of paintings

she also loved painting landscapes, and was particularly inspired by desert landscapes in new mexico:

image
image
image
image

she also painted bones, particularly skulls. like flowers, she was inspired by the abstract shapes that bones make:

image
image
image
image
image

her artwork is extremely cool and she deserves to have a legacy other than “flowers”

image

Also, part of the reason people were so quick to interpret her work as sexualized pieces instead of the cutting edge explorations of color and abstraction they really were, was because of her relationship with photographer Alfred Stieglitz, who helped launch her career.

For Stieglitz and much of the male avant garde, eroticism was what set their work apart as ~edgy and exciting, and so O’Keeffe kinda got pigeon-holed by association. It’s a real testament to how a lack of diversity in the art world stifles artists’ own voices in regard to their own damn work.

(via corgusprime)

vampireapologist:

I hear a lot of back and forth about STEM students vs Arts students but as someone who was a theatre major and then went into STEM I have to tell you there really is no reason they shouldn’t get along.

Being late for ballet and trying to get onto an elevator only to find it full nearly chest-deep with balloons and then the elevator goes to the next floor up and a girl gets on as an audience outside the elevator claps and the door closes and she says “you just walked into my absurdist installation art play” has an energy directly aligned with hearing the intern who recently accidentally made chlorine gas say “Dr. [man in charge of the lab] said we could just get rid of the extra liquid nitrogen by pouring it all on the floor and watching it disappear.”

(via vampireapologist-archive-deacti)

magicalbiitch:

Black Panther deserves to win the Oscar for best costume design based solely on the fact that it’s the only movie whose costumes haven’t been done and done and redone again. like i understand we all love the big poofy colorful fancy dresses of the 18th century but my god they’ve been done. Black Panther went above and beyond to incorporate various African tribes. Ms. Ruth E. Carter took her time envisioning designs based on a world untoucjed by colonizers, and the results are

beautiful

image

modern

image

colorful

image

and aid in the movie’s storytelling in a way the costume design of the other nominated movies simply does not.

again, Black Panther deserves to win the Oscar for Costume Design and Ms. Ruth E. Carter deserves so much praise for the beautiful masterpieces she created

image

(via starforged)